The worst thing about this time of year, to me—at least in non-election years, Jesus Christ am I sick of that shit—is waiting for Sierra Nevada Brewing Company to release its famous winter fresh hop IPA, Celebration. The ongoing seasonal creep in beer releases means now’s about the time the winter ales start hitting the shelves. Hell, I’m already almost two six-packs into this year’s release of Great Divide Hibernation, but Sierra Nevada seems to be stubborn about this one, year in and year out. This past week, though, they threw me a bone, dropping a pretty impressive Snowpack winter sampler that features a single-hop Centennial IPA, a cold brew coffee stout, and the beer I want to tell to you about today, Sierra Nevada Maple Scotch.
The Scotch ale is an underrated fall and winter staple, potentially even more complex than the big stouts and barleywines and just plain more satisfying than your average spice-heavy winter warmer. The style’s a favorite of lady snow’s in particular. And Sierra Nevada’s come up with a fun twist on it here, with an addition of sweet, delicious maple syrup.
Sierra Nevada Maple Scotch pours a slightly hazy auburn, with ruby highlights and a cream-white head that’s dense if not especially thick, fading away after a couple of minutes. It smells like bitter chocolate and raisins, and tastes like those same things plus a big touch of black cherry. The thing that’s most noticeably not here is any evidence of peat smoke. Peat-smoked malt is not mandatory or even traditional for a Scotch ale, mind—from what I’ve read, it’s only American brewers who really do it—but I usually prefer it, and I suspect it would have combined wonderfully with maple. On the other hand, peat smoke is very much a taste that doesn’t suit all palates, and this beer does not give me the impression that it’s truly missing anything.
Now, the bottle’s label advertises “a hint of maple” and I’d say that’s about right. This isn’t the rich, syrupy maple flavor of, you know, a Founders Canadian Breakfast Stout. It’s also not the focused, crystalline sweetness of Abita Turbodog, a beer that always reminds me of Grade A amber maple syrup despite not actually having any maple syrup in it. It’s more just the impression of maple, a sort of… to get real nerdy about this, a sort of delicious background radiation that underlies and permeates the whole flavor profile of the beer without ever really calling attention to itself. This is a delicate and skillful balancing act, and it works like a charm, letting the maple enhance a well-made beer that’s already rich and sweet and satisfying rather than competing with it or even overpowering it.
lady snow says: Definitely a Scotch ale! I always say that, when I have really distinctive beer styles. “Definitely a fill-in-the-blank!” But really, this reminds me a lot of one of my favorites, Scots Gone Wild. Minus the wild ale part, of course. I really like the maple.
make it snow says: Yeah, how’s that maple presenting for you?
lady snow says: When I first take a sip, that sweetness hits me, and then it kind of fades out. It’s more distinctly a Scotch ale taste on the finish. Definitely the malts are adding to that sweetness too. This makes me want to go tap a tree. Not in that way. This was a good night to drink this, though. Nice and cool, for once.
tl;dr: Sierra Nevada Maple Scotch is only packaged in Sierra Nevada’s Snow Pack winter sampler. You never really want to buy a sampler box for the sake of one beer, and with this one, you don’t have to. In addition to the Scotch ale, the box contains an excellent coffee stout and single-hop IPA as well as the timeless Sierra Nevada Pale Ale.
Grade: I gotta get some waffles.
make it snow is an alot of beer and Overwatch support main. He drank two Sierra Nevada Maple Scotches while writing this review, and lady snow drank the third, and now we’re all out of Maple Scotch. Alas.
“make it snow is an alot of beer and Overwatch support main.”
Ooh him card read good!
(Sierra Nevada may owe you a commission in about an hour. I’m really thirsty.)
BECAUSE DENNIS IS A BASTARD MAN
“He drank two Sierra Nevada Maple Scotches while writing this review, and lady snow drank the third, and now we’re all out of Maple Scotch.”
This is the most tragic thing I’ve read involving the Scotch* since Macbeth.
*yeah, I know.
This joke may have been from its womb untimely ripped.
Out, damned spot! Out, I say!—One, two. Why, then, ’tis time to do ’t. Hell is murky!—Fie, my lord, fie!
– Me, trying to remove a cum stain from my top hat
Inside or outside the top hat?
Can’t it be both?
I like the cut of your jib.
Scotch ales are delightful. I’m not the biggest maple fan in the world, but sometimes it can be good. This sounds like a good application.
I have a Great Divide Old Ruffian in the fridge. Not a scotch ale, but one I’m looking forward to trying. I’m going to buy as much Hair Of The Dog Doggie Claws as I can this year, since that stuff is good (as long as they don’t fuck up the bottling, which they do sometimes).
Also, Monk’s Cafe Flemish Sour comes in cans. What a time to be alive.
Old Ruffian was the first barleywine I ever tried. What a glorious evening that was. Hope you like it!
I kind of hate Monk’s Cafe, and the very similar Duchesse de Bourgogne. That’s not because they’re actually bad beers, which they’re not, they just have a particular balance of sweet vs. sour that’s really unappealing to me. I really prefer Cuvée des Jacobins if I’m going to have a Flemish red.
Cuvee des Jacobins is definitely the best of those three. I’ll agree with that.
I’m beginning to pick up that your tastes only go so far with sweet, at least with beer. No judgement there, just sort of noticing that. I have definitely lessened my enjoyment of sweetness in a lot of things–beer especially–in the last few years. Cocktails even more so–some places murder booze with so much sugar.
I think you’re probably right. Not that I don’t love beers at the extreme sweet end of the spectrum, like Southern Tier’s fucking sugar bombs, but I think I love those with the dessert part of my brain more than with the beer part. “This beer would suck less if it weren’t so sweet” is probably my most frequent criticism.
On the other hand, though… most of my all of my all-time top ten beers are barrel-aged stouts or barleywines. Those tend to be very sweet beers, but I think what distinguishes them is they’re not one-note sweet. They typically taste like chocolate and vanilla and bourbon and frequently various other good things, and the best ones combine all of those flavors into a cohesive whole. That’s very different to me, I guess, than a Märzen or a Scotch ale or a brown ale or a Flemish red having its other flavors washed out by some generic malt sweetness, which I think is what I really hate more than anything.
You touch on a good point here–I think we of the over-sugared nation forget that sweetness is a flavor, and like other flavors, there’s not just one type of sweet, and not all sweetness is reserved for dessert, especially in combination with other flavor profiles.
One thing I would love to find a book or a class or a total geek/expert on is not just the art of cocktail making and mixing of all those flavor profiles, but the science of it–how the ph factor and degrees brix and everything else plays into how the eventual flavor will turn out. Then factoring in other flavor notes to figure out what will work together in one way or another. Such as this beer/chocolate pairing thing I went to tonight (named Choktoberfest, wah wah), and the definite highlight was Hair Of The Dog Otto From The Wood paired with blue cheese stuffed chocolate dipped figs. It was like magic. I want to know the chemical background for that magic.
Scotch Ale is indeed underrated, although that is often the fault of the brewers. Like IPAs or Stouts, it’s so easy to use the ‘primary’ flavor component as a crutch that you end up with single-note beers. I’m curious about this here maple aspect, since it’s a different kind of sweetness.
Also, if you add any peat, you are a fucking poser. Peat is good for 3 things: 1. Warming your house if everything else is too wet to burn, 2. Scotch (sometimes) and 3. Fertilizing your garden if you want something that only smells a little like manure.
I think “poseur” is a good way to describe the instinct to add peated malt. It’s definitely about making the beer seem more “authentically” Scottish, even though actual Scottish brewers don’t do it. But it’s delicious to me, so I give it a big pass.
Deep down, we are all a little scotchy, are we NAWT??
[reads header, gets excited]
[reads thru post]
[realizes it wasn’t about me at all]
[leaves disappointed]
It’s an allegory.
http://68.media.tumblr.com/f70173f84a7b976f8899d1af4873f0ee/tumblr_o32chdcSe71s9jja0o1_400.jpg
http://67.media.tumblr.com/8a54bbbcc8a58b8c973d0c7eae7a19b8/tumblr_nmyr43oecF1sraya7o1_400.gif